Title: Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation

Meta:

• Tags: #[[references]] #[[D/Synthesis Infrastructure]]
• Authored by:: [[David N. Boote]] [[Penny Beile]]
• Year: [[2005]]
• Publication: Educational Researcher
• URL: Boote & Beile (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher

Content

• Abstract
  • undefined

#lit-context

#[[📝 lit-notes]]

• the level of synthesis in regular manuscripts frequently subpar (p.4)
  • #ClaimSecondary
  • 

    ⥅ [[https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FNbJN82GKeI.png?alt=media&token=94bb3cf6-b064-4fe9-a64b-7b03468bd692]]

  • cites #[[@alton-leeTroubleshooterChecklistProspective1998]], who found that, out of 369 criticisms in 142 reviews for 58 manuscripts submitted for review to Teaching and Teacher education, approximately 33% ({{[[calc]]: (31+29+23+21+20)}} / 369) were directly related to inadequacies in [[synthesis]]
• Developed a rubric for scoring literature reviews, including a category for [[synthesis]]
  • 

    ⥅ [[https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FyPK1uMfJyb?alt=media&token=4a2ebef2-85f1-48e7-b5a2-8a5ad89d5c4d]]